I plan to submit clang required changes in multiple patches. Maybe only the last patch will enable clang in config files. The first few should introduce no regression to gcc compilation.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Josh Stone <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/04/2015 10:13 AM, Chih-Hung Hsieh wrote: > > Clang compiler gives warning to non-standard format %Z. > > I think the change is fine -- %z is C99 and used in many places. > > But isn't Clang rejected by configure.ac for not supporting nested > functions? Are you patching that behavior too? > >
