On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 09:33 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > I prefer the simpler: if (n < sizeof (w) * 8) w >>= n; else w = 0; > Which simply states what value we expect for w.
I pushed this version to master now.
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 09:33 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > I prefer the simpler: if (n < sizeof (w) * 8) w >>= n; else w = 0; > Which simply states what value we expect for w.
I pushed this version to master now.