On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 20:49 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:30 -0800, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> > This patch provides a dummy sparc_set_initial_registers-tid for
> > sparc32. This fixes the build in sparcv9-*-* targets.
> [...]
> > diff --git a/backends/sparc_initreg.c b/backends/sparc_initreg.c
> > index c2a9b32..c4b321c 100644
> > --- a/backends/sparc_initreg.c
> > +++ b/backends/sparc_initreg.c
> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ EBLHOOK (set_initial_registers_tid) (pid_t tid
> > __attribute__ ((unused)),
> > ebl_tid_registers_t *setfunc
> > __attribute__ ((unused)),
> > void *arg __attribute__ ((unused)))
> > {
> > -#ifndef __sparc__
> > +#if !defined(__sparc__) || !defined( __arch64__)
> > return false;
> > #else /* __sparc__ */
>
> Really __arch64__?
O, I see, it says __arch64__, not __aarch64__.
Duh. Slightly confusing. Sorry. Applied.
Thanks,
Mark
