On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:06:36PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote: > If so, define attribute_hidden to be empty. Also, use attribute_hidden > in all places where we hide symbols. If this attribute is missing, it > simply means that we cannot hide private symbols in the binary using > attributes. This disables some optimizations and may increase the risk > of symbol name clashes with other libraries, but is not fatal. > > However, we still employ linker version scripts to explicitly define > the exported symbols. This serves much of the same purpose. Also, as > all our symbols are prefixed with the library name, and "__" for > private ones, the chance of clashes is low anyway.
Like the previous one, I have my doubts. But it actually makes the source code slightly more consistent. So applied. Thanks, Mark
