On 12/14/2017 02:51 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > This is clever and indeed cu_sec_idx () is not generic enough. > But this is also somewhat inefficient. I am working on DWARF5 support > and there a CU can come from even more different sections (or file). So > I am changing Dwarf_CU to have an explicit section to which is it is > associated. This can then also be used by the "fake" CUs like created > in dwarf_getmacros.
Mind that the two most common cases are 0 and 1. In fact nothing else was supported before this change. So, most of the time this will not do a lot of iteration. regards, Ulf
