https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32370
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> ---
Question is whether we should try to handle them in the debug sections.
e.g. for hello.o we currently get:
$ eu-readelf -U --debug-dump=loc /tmp/hello.o
DWARF section [ 9] '.debug_loclists' at offset 0x227:
Table at Offset 0x0:
Length: 85
DWARF version: 5
Address size: 8
Segment size: 0
Offset entries: 0
CU [ c] base: 000000000000000000
Offset: c, Index: 0
base_address 0x0
offset_pair 0, 4
[ 0] reg10
offset_pair 4, 11
[ 0] reg15
offset_pair 11, 12
[ 0] entry_value:
[ 0] reg10
[ 3] stack_value
end_of_list
Offset: 28, Index: 1c
base_address 0x0
offset_pair 0, 11
[ 0] reg11
offset_pair 11, 12
[ 0] entry_value:
[ 0] reg11
[ 3] stack_value
end_of_list
Offset: 3f, Index: 33
start_length 0x4, 6
[ 0] reg10
end_of_list
Offset: 4c, Index: 40
start_length 0x4, 6
[ 0] reg15
end_of_list
While the linked variant gives:
$ eu-readelf -U --debug-dump=loc /tmp/testfileloc
DWARF section [32] '.debug_loclists' at offset 0x2a70:
Table at Offset 0x0:
Length: 85
DWARF version: 5
Address size: 8
Segment size: 0
Offset entries: 0
CU [ c] base: 000000000000000000
Offset: c, Index: 0
base_address 0x103f0
offset_pair 0, 4
[ 0] reg10
offset_pair 4, b
[ 0] reg15
offset_pair b, c
[ 0] entry_value:
[ 0] reg10
[ 3] stack_value
end_of_list
Offset: 28, Index: 1c
base_address 0x103f0
offset_pair 0, b
[ 0] reg11
offset_pair b, c
[ 0] entry_value:
[ 0] reg11
[ 3] stack_value
end_of_list
Offset: 3f, Index: 33
start_length 0x103f4, 6
[ 0] reg10
end_of_list
Offset: 4c, Index: 40
start_length 0x103f4, 6
[ 0] reg15
end_of_list
So the offset pairs look slightly off. Is that a problem?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
