On Thu, Jun 25, 2026, at 12:33 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > OK, so then we should push Naveed's v2 patch (which makes the MIN > change)? > >> , but it's worth >> considering whether we should have this case fail with >> return false instead of asserting or silently cutting off the second >> half of the x86_64 register file. > > Or... Do you want to request this change? > I think you are the best person to determine what is best here. After consideration, I would go ahead and push Naveed's fix with the MIN(). Signed-off-by: Serhei Makarov <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] x86: Fix out-of-bounds read of register table in sa... Naveed Khan
- Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix out-of-bounds read of register ta... Mark Wielaard
- [PATCH v2] [PATCH v2] x86: Fix out-of-bounds read ... Naveed Khan
- [PATCH v3] [PATCH v2] x86: Fix out-of-bounds read ... Naveed Khan
- Re: [PATCH v3] [PATCH v2] x86: Fix out-of-boun... Naveed Khan
- Re: [PATCH v3] [PATCH v2] x86: Fix out-of-... Mark Wielaard
- Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix out-of-bounds read of registe... Serhei Makarov
- Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix out-of-bounds read of reg... Mark Wielaard
- Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix out-of-bounds read of... Serhei Makarov
- Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix out-of-bounds re... Mark Wielaard
