https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34402
Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC| |mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> ---
Thanks, it took me a while to realize what really was going on. We forgot the
bit29 reserved string in the hwcaps name array. Pushed as:
commit 01a933566e2606e17893a72121e70c81ba7558dc
Author: Mark Wielaard <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Jul 16 22:47:18 2026 +0200
backends: define strings for all sparc hwcap bits
Not all sparc hwcaps bits do have a defined meaning. For those that
don't we use the "resvBIT" string, where BIT is 0..31. Bits 29 to 31
weren't defined, but we forgot to add the "resv29" string causing an
off-by one when trying to find the name for bit 30 (called "resv31")
and 31 (not set, so NULL).
* backends/sparc_attrs.c (sparc_check_object_attribute):
insert "resv29" into hwcaps array.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34402
Reported-by: nathan auvray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <[email protected]>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
