> > From: me > > Is it somehow possible to bind ^Tab? If I use... > > bind "main" "Tab" = "move-link-next" > > bind "main" "Ctrl-Tab = "tab-next" > > ...then ^Tab does "move-link-next".
> From: Will Maier > Terminals don't see ^Tab (since Tab is actually ^I), so they just > pass Tab to elinks, AFAIK. But--Will!--I happen to have been plagiarizing one of _your_ elinks.conf files this morning which has... bind "main" "Ctrl-Tab" = "frame-next" [Sorry, I couldn't resist.] Yes, once upon a time I knew Tab is ^I. Forgive me for forgeting. > > Is it somehow possible to bind ^C to "history-move-back"? If > > I use... > > bind "main" "Ctrl-C" = "history-move-back" > > ...then ^C does "really-quit". > I don't think elinks does any special trapping for ^C; it'll just > accept it as normal (and quit, as you noticed). Elinks sometimes does.... install_signal_handler(SIGINT, (void (*)(void *)) sig_ctrl_c, term, 0); and eventually... set_kbd_term_event(&ev, KBD_CTRL_C, KBD_MOD_NONE); But it's not clear what's going on by glancing at the source. Rather than poke at it, I'm hoping someone who knows the source will chime in? steve - - - _______________________________________________ elinks-users mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
