Thanks John for the reply, Yes, I totally agree with you, both the approaches could be possible but it'll be little mixed up and also re-working the shell script would also do the work. I'll try to add both the points into my proposal .
- Tushar On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:34 PM, John 'Warthog9' Hawley < [email protected]> wrote: > On 03/20/2015 10:32 PM, Tushar Rajput wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the past days I was consulting Make Documentation to get the deeper > > knowledge in that area and I thought that this would be better for > > resolving the issues of current build system because it would be the > > least tedious path. > > > > As I was working on GSoc application and wants to add this function as > > a primary solution for cleaning up the build system .Which do you think > > would be more efficient and beneficial for the build system, either > > re-working the shell or converting it to the Makefiles ? > > I don't know, mainly because I can see both approaches as being useful > to people. In it's simplest form just re-working the shell script may > be enough, and obviously offers us a lot more flexibility than > Makefiles. On the flip side Makefiles mean just typing `make` and > having something build. I'm happy to entertain both approaches, and if > a student is feeling particularly adventurous it's possible to do both > with a little bit of planning. > > - John > > _______________________________________________ > elinux-MinnowBoard mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.elinux.org/mailman/listinfo/elinux-minnowboard >
_______________________________________________ elinux-MinnowBoard mailing list [email protected] http://lists.elinux.org/mailman/listinfo/elinux-minnowboard
