> Just wondering, is this necessary because it's impossible to list the > function clauses or because there's no straightforward way to turn a > function clause into one hand of a pattern match? >
It is necessary if we want to do things such as "diffing". For example, if we can't match a clause because a map is missing a field, we should tell the field that is missing when we implement such feature. This "diffing" or "explaining" requires reimplementing pattern matching. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4KtuWGrhiFb6f6nEur2yLAeSjnrU7eOpLoSz%2BhuWq%2BNRA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
