Actually, a PR was already sent here: https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/pull/11991 :)
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:57 AM José Valim <jose.va...@dashbit.co> wrote: > Yes. And if any unknown option is given, perhaps we should store the > underlying options in the struct and change the inspect representation to > output Regex.compile!(…) > > Please open up an issue and PRs welcome too! > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 05:41 Quentin Crain <czrp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I hope I am acting appropriately here! >> >> Per this elixirforum post: >> https://elixirforum.com/t/is-it-normal-that-regex-compile-2-does-not-print-regex-modifiers-when-atoms-are-passed-in-options/48992 >> >> When atoms are used as options to Regex.compile, they are not translated >> into their character equivalents and added to the Regex struct: >> >> iex(6)> Regex.compile("foo", "i") >> {:ok, ~r/foo/i} >> iex(7)> Regex.compile("foo", [:caseless]) >> {:ok, ~r/foo/} >> >> Should they be? I have an initial implementation waiting if so . . . >> >> Respectfully, >> >> Quentin (Q) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "elixir-lang-core" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/30477ff6-7eca-4e66-a118-2bf3920abd34n%40googlegroups.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/30477ff6-7eca-4e66-a118-2bf3920abd34n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4JjKTAs3CUKnQfd0VUBUozTyWeEd1GTXjY1JUvz_rAiTA%40mail.gmail.com.
