It seems really close to this discussion:
https://groups.google.com/g/elixir-lang-core/c/1wixK5zNBEw/m/FVNpANbPBQAJ.

I don't think this would solve the issue completely though: should we then
warn for nested maps like `[%{}] =` or `{:ok, %{}} =`? (which might be
intended)
Also, people might be writing `%{name: "foo"} =` actually meaning `%{name:
"foo"} ==`, but I don't think we should warn on these.

> my recommendation is to always do `assert actual == expected` and `assert
expected = actual`, never `assert expected == actual`

I really like this suggestion you made in the previous thread, it helps a
lot distinguishing between matches and equality, maybe it could be
encouraged in the official docs?



Le mar. 16 août 2022 à 19:17, Wojtek Mach <woj...@wojtekmach.pl> a écrit :

> Just to be clear what I proposed was not a change in the compiler, just
> changing ExUnit's assert macro to emit the warning under that specific
> scenario.
>
> On 16 Aug 2022, at 11:59, Ben Wilson <benwilson...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> To me this feels like a good use of credo or similar linter, not something
> that the Elixir compiler itself should warn about. `assert %{} = x` isn't
> the most idiomatic way to match but it isn't incoherent or invalid, just
> probably not best practice.
>
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 5:55:09 AM UTC-4 woj...@wojtekmach.pl
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Developers can easily shoot themselves in the foot if they write:
>>
>>     assert %{} = x
>>
>> but really what they meant was to write:
>>
>>     assert %{} == x
>>
>> The mistake is writing `=` instead of `==`, an easy one to make. The
>> difference is of course that the former will succeed on _any_ map and the
>> latter will _only_ succeed on an _empty_ map.
>>
>> I'd like to propose ExUnit warn on `assert %{} = x` and tell users to
>> instead write `assert is_map(x)`.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> P.S. In my projects I'd either write `assert actual == expected` OR
>> `assert expected = actual` and never `assert expected == actual` exactly
>> because it is easy to make the mistake. Maybe there is a Credo check to
>> enforce such style.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/b70a4bb4-14d4-4ea3-8b49-45b408abf750n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/b70a4bb4-14d4-4ea3-8b49-45b408abf750n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/D3AD3ABD-1F0F-48F8-B9C2-A3E6B67E8EB1%40wojtekmach.pl
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/D3AD3ABD-1F0F-48F8-B9C2-A3E6B67E8EB1%40wojtekmach.pl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CANnyohY3LT826R%3D3h%3DNhhNMjias-LKfUuHRhpnL_SQxMDvxiag%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to