I'd originally looked for tests in the spec, browsers, and other languages
to compare against.

W3C's current test suite doesn't seem comprehensive:
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/encoding/replacement-encodings.any.js

Go has a few token tests that are relatively intelligible:
https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.21.3:src/bytes/bytes_test.go;l=1157

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 2:09 PM José Valim <jose.va...@dashbit.co> wrote:

> Does the specification provide tests for us to include? Otherwise we can
> include enough tests for full line coverage and a “brute force”/property
> test commented out.
>
> I would say the name “replace_invalid” is excellent.
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 18:52 Cameron Duley <cameron.dule...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This was the final version I'd landed on for UTF-8:
>>
>> https://github.com/elixir-unicode/unicode/blob/main/lib/unicode/validation/utf8.ex
>>
>> Along with the following modules for testing:
>>
>> https://github.com/elixir-unicode/unicode/blob/main/test/support/unicode_validation_helpers.ex
>>
>> https://github.com/elixir-unicode/unicode/blob/main/test/unicode_validation_test.exs
>>
>> I think it's ideal functionality to have in the String module, and the
>> implementation's "reasonable enough" until a native solution's available in
>> OTP.
>>
>> Testing is my only uncertainty - How much is prudent and in what manner?
>> On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 12:35:48 PM UTC-4 José Valim wrote:
>>
>>> Folks, I am following up on this, where did we land?
>>>
>>> The new implementation is roughly ~70LOC for UTF-8, so at first I don't
>>> see an issue with adding it to Elixir. However, the Elixir version would be
>>> UTF-8 only (part of the String module).
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 10:51:34 PM UTC+2 Kip wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cameron, I think this would be a useful addition to the Unicode library
>>>> <https://github.com/elixir-unicode/unicode> I maintain. If that works
>>>> for you, please open an issue there and we can collaborate.  I think it
>>>> being part of the Erlang `:unicode` module makes good sense too as José
>>>> says but that's a longer "sales" and implementation cycle.
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 7:40:50 PM UTC+11 José Valim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Cameron,
>>>>>
>>>>> If the goal is to include this handling for UTF-16 and UTF-32, I
>>>>> suggest proposing this to Erlang/OTP as new functions in the "unicode"
>>>>> module. Otherwise, Elixir only has facilities to deal with UTF-8. You 
>>>>> could
>>>>> propose such a feature in their issues tracker.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also note that "rolling your own" or "depending on packages" is
>>>>> usually not enough reasons for adding features to Elixir. Otherwise, one
>>>>> could easily argue Decimal and Jason would be more important additions to
>>>>> the language. :) We do describe which features we would consider part of
>>>>> the language here: https://elixir-lang.org/development.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Other than that, awesome job on the library and benchmarks. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 1:03 AM Kip <kipc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your implementation is definitely fast and memory efficient so I
>>>>>> retract my implementation comments. Now that I've run the benchmarking
>>>>>> script and tested out a few different approaches leveraging the std lib I
>>>>>> understand better why you've taken the approach you have. Nice work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 9:26:37 AM UTC+11 Kip wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cameron, I think this is a useful proposal.  Elixir has means to
>>>>>>> check validity (String.valid?/1) and a mechanism to split valid and 
>>>>>>> invalid
>>>>>>> code points (String.chunk/2 with the :valid trait). But there isn't, to 
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> knowledge, a means to coerce validity.  A couple of thoughts:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Since Elixir strings are, by definition, UTF8, I don't know that
>>>>>>> special handling of UTF16 and UTF32 code points makes much sense - 
>>>>>>> although
>>>>>>> I accept this may be more Unicode compliant.
>>>>>>> 2. What would the function be called? Since we have String.valid?/1
>>>>>>> maybe String.validate/2 with an option `replace_invalid: utf8_string`. 
>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>> default `:replace_invalid` could be U+FFFD or it could be `nil`.
>>>>>>> If the default is `nil` then there could also be a `String.validate!/2`
>>>>>>> that raises if there is no `:replace_invalid` option.
>>>>>>> 3. I think the implementation could leverage the code of
>>>>>>> `String.chunk/2` which uses `String.next_codepoint/1`. That would 
>>>>>>> simplify
>>>>>>> implementation and be more consistent in code style.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:24:28 PM UTC+11
>>>>>>> cameron...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As far as I can tell, neither Elixir nor Erlang have a built in
>>>>>>>> function for replacing invalid sequences in Unicode. There's a 
>>>>>>>> suggested
>>>>>>>> method on this page
>>>>>>>> <https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode15.0.0/UnicodeStandard-15.0.pdf#page=153>
>>>>>>>> of the Unicode standard for handling this. Several other languages (
>>>>>>>> Go <https://pkg.go.dev/bytes#ToValidUTF8>, Python
>>>>>>>> <https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#bytes.decode>, C#
>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/13547>, etc) now follow
>>>>>>>> this spec.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Invalid Unicode's encountered frequently enough that I think it's
>>>>>>>> worth incorporating a solution into Elixir itself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Present alternatives to handling invalid unicode (and json by
>>>>>>>> extension <https://github.com/michalmuskala/jason/issues/174>) are:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - Crashing (not ideal in many cases)
>>>>>>>>    - Roll your own (lot of overhead for accidental complexity)
>>>>>>>>    - Depend on a package (+1 package towards dependency hell)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is my college try
>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/Moosieus/UniRecover/tree/main>, but I'm
>>>>>>>> certain there's a performant and far cleaner solution to be had in pure
>>>>>>>> Elixir. If not, perhaps this is a request for OTP.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to elixir-lang-co...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/197620a2-6a96-41c6-a6e7-5da03e351080n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/197620a2-6a96-41c6-a6e7-5da03e351080n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "elixir-lang-core" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/26e4c761-caf0-46ea-ab08-a33407febdb8n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/26e4c761-caf0-46ea-ab08-a33407febdb8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4LKEOb%3D7WMeUhots27dj%3DAwvhLF3o%2Bo7Q2%2BhZXMNQi8YA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4LKEOb%3D7WMeUhots27dj%3DAwvhLF3o%2Bo7Q2%2BhZXMNQi8YA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Thanks,

Cameron Duley

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAH7jZqe%3D%3DKUPG6O3v_%3DSr%3DAjzv28X5x1QvpF-bqJ96XWOVPu5w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to