I totally agree with you. Gemfiles are horrible for specifying a version of ruby that's always different of mine ;_; (I have to edit them by hand and I find this awful, but we're not on the ruby ML and I shall not complain more about it).
On 05/21/2016 11:17 PM, Scott Ribe wrote: > On May 21, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Uniaika <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The bad thing is (in my very humble and personal opinion) that it's not >> a binary that I can "drop on any machine without having to think about >> what's installed on them" (I'm looking at you, Go.) > > While I don't like the requirement that the VM be installed, I also have > written many command-line utilities in Ruby, and over the years have > experienced a number of issues with version compatibility issues between Ruby > & all the gems. > > So I'm slowly coming around to the opinion that Elixir is probably *better* > than Ruby, and if I was willing to use Ruby, then why not Elixir??? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-talk/9aaac92b-2086-4540-179d-266cd6245ef1%40crypto-keupone.eu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
