Hey Tim, On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Tim Stewart <finelinestu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm interested in what others think about this specific use of infix.
The issue with infix operators is they add a few extra thing you have to worry about: * precedence, aka. order of operations * it's easy to screw up what's getting applied to what without lots of explicit parens sometimes * It can make code harder to parse for humans when overused. This is the number complaint I got from co-workers reading my code with lots of operators. * can be sometimes difficult to compose with other functions (like the pipeline example) As for this particular operator, I had a similar operator in my Haskell codebase. Over time I abandoned it for the reasons above. Cheers, William --- https://jb55.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
