Aliases could also remain forever, so people could choose which they prefer. However, this seems counter to the prevailing direction for Elm.
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM UTC-4, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrote: > > I think aliasing would just push the problem further into the future. At > some point breakage would have to happen, there's no reason to not having > it being done right now. It's not like your code base will be any smaller > when the aliasing is removed. > > True, the change should be reflected in similar functions. Just like > library authors are encouraged to change the definition for andThen to be > used with pipes instead of backticks (requires arguments to be flipped). > > onsdag 26. oktober 2016 14.21.02 UTC+2 skrev Wouter In t Velt følgende: >> >> Op woensdag 26 oktober 2016 13:21:03 UTC+2 schreef Rupert Smith: >>> >>> Also worth pointing out that these libraries (and possibly others) have >>> adopted the convention of using a single 'l' or 'r' to mean from-the-left >>> and from-the-right: >>> >> >> And the List library also has a scanl function (no scanr), which - >> should some renaming of foldl happen - would be nice to keep consistent. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
