Gotcha. Presumably there would have to be an Elm flavor of it, which may not work the same way but kept the core concept of being an 'let..in' the other way up.
I have a feeling that 'where' would clarify a lot of my code. But I also have a feeling I'll never see it in Elm. On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 21:58:35 UTC, Janis Voigtländer wrote: > > As pointed out earlier, it is not true for *Haskell's* let and where. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
