I wasn't aware of Jade Templates being a common use case for the Cycle.js community. I was only aware of this issue- https://github.com/cyclejs/cyclejs/issues/321 resulting in this proof of concept- http://www.webpackbin.com/Nkd5aKiIf which is made possible by Cycle.JS not attaching event handlers in the view function, as noted by Andre Statlz in this discussion, https://www.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/3zr6i0/conversation_whats_the_core_differences_between/ unlike Elm.
I really enjoy thinking in the pure functions of Hyperscript-Helpers or Elm of the Html package, for which the creator of Cycle.JS seemingly strongly supports http://staltz.com/some-problems-with-react-redux.html https://medium.com/@jador/jsx-4b978fbeb290#.8g4fr4fnc over "templates" like JSX. But to each their own. On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 10:17:32 AM UTC-8, Илья Толлю wrote: > > Hello, everybody! > > I'm new to Elm and I like its architecture very much. Except one nuance > annoys me. > If you take e.g. CycleJS there we observe view's events by selectors > external to view. I.e. view is not responsible for routing its events. That > responsibility is given to another part of code, which creates Observables. > So, we can use Jade/Pug or another templating technology and cleanly > separate view declaration and events listening declaration. > Considering that Elm is functional language, there can be some pattern > that aims to achieve the same result, so I could write View and Observables > in different sections. > > It would be great to know your opinion and experience. > > Best regards! > Ilja Tollu > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
