The roadmap is still accurate. Evan talked about this at elm-conf, and we will be releasing the video with 0.19 (it goes into a lot of "why?" and mirrors the roadmap nicely.)
I can't speak to major language features, but Evan is still working on Elm full-time. The language is alive and kicking. I know it's hard to see that progress sometimes, but it's definitely happening! > On Oct 26, 2017, at 2:49 PM, Frank Bonetti <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is the roadmap reliable though?. It states that the major focus of 0.19 will > be single-page apps, and that features such as server-side rendering, tree > shaking, code splitting, and lazy loading may be introduced. However, a > status update was posted in elm-dev in July > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elm-dev/hO-2DBq_h-U/6QkOGOxIAAAJ> and it > made no mention of single-page apps. The next release seems to be focused on > improving the implementation of Core functions. I asked Evan if the stated > priorities of 0.19 had changed > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elm-dev/hO-2DBq_h-U/4QfToE7IFAAJ> but didn't > get a response. Based on the roadmap you would think that 0.19 would > introduce some major new features but it's shaping up to be more of an > incremental release. That's fine with me personally (I'm don't necessarily > need stuff like code splitting), but it would be nice if the roadmap was > updated to reflect those changes in direction. > > > On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 12:50:57 PM UTC-5, Brian Hicks wrote: > There are a lot of answers to that question here: > https://github.com/elm-lang/projects/blob/master/roadmap.md > <https://github.com/elm-lang/projects/blob/master/roadmap.md> > > Even if the language were not being actively developed (which it is) the > community is thriving and I would hope makes the investment in using the > language worthwhile. :) > > On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 12:48:53 PM UTC-5, LondonTokyo wrote: > so.... > > Its now been a year since the last Elm release, and there has been no updates > in Github for 3 months, as far as I can see. Last blog update was about > Google Summer of code. > > Seems to me that Elm is danger of becoming abandoned, and is going stale. It > certainly does not seem like it is something worth investing any time on, nor > does it seem safe to write any application in Elm anymore. > > Don't get me wrong, I love Elm, I think it solves some great problems > elegantly. But where is it heading? What's the roadmap? Why are there no / > little communication / publication from the maintainer(s)? > > Or did I miss something? > > Thoughts? > > H > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/iy-nyZXDk58/unsubscribe > <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/iy-nyZXDk58/unsubscribe>. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
