On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 2:38:09 AM UTC, GordonBGood wrote: > > Meanwhile the memoized Lazy type library really is needed, else there is > no way to implement memoization without custom JavaScript, which is frowned > upon. >
I think you make a good case for keeping it in Gordon. When I started this thread, all I really needed is a CIS for random numbers, but I can see that true lazy lists have their uses. Is it really worth throwing them out to make garbage collection by reference counting only possible if/when Elm is ported to web assembly? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
