On 10/10/12 23:30, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
I'd suggest kernel30 rather than kernel-lt since the long term in this case is not that long and soon we'll be trying to work out how to change kernel-lt-3.0-x to kernel-lt-3.8.x or whatever the next LTS kernel happens to be.
Unless the desired action is to update to the latest LTS kernel at that point? At which time a user can add an exclude for kernel-lt if they want to stay at an unsupported 3.0.y.
But I take your point. What do others think? _______________________________________________ elrepo mailing list elrepo@lists.elrepo.org http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo