I had to explain this again today. @alan, or @akemi, thoughts? Thanks, Dave.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:06 PM Dave Chiluk <dchi...@indeed.com> wrote: > If I'm not mistaken in kernel-ml, ml stands for mainline. This is > actually quite a misnomer as kernel.org uses mainline to refer to Linus' > development tree. In actuality kernel-ml is instead built off of the > stable tree. I've seen a number of people get confused by this nuance. > > I know it would suck to do, but it really feels like it should be named > something like kernel-stable *(because of kernel.org conventions), or > possibly kernel-st (for short-term). I'm not really sure what the correct > name should be, but I'm certain it should not be kernel-ml. > > We could even create a transitional kernel-ml package that depends on the > newly named rpm to provide a no-brainer upgrade path. > > Thanks, > Dave. >
_______________________________________________ elrepo mailing list elrepo@lists.elrepo.org http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
