>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes:
EZ> The key to a useful discussion of these matters is to decide up EZ> front what do we want to support and what do we want the text to EZ> look like. EZ> In this case, someone who knows about (La)TeX much more than I do EZ> should first describe what TeX features would be useful when EZ> typesetting bidirectional text. Given that: the UAX is specific to plain text emacs' modes uses faces to differentiate syntactically different text runs the latter is essentially the same as (invisible) markup then one could conclude that bidi runs always should be intra-face and never inter-face, yes? How well does >>back to default on face changes<< translate to the level where emacs' bidi works? -JimC -- James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ emacs-bidi mailing list emacs-bidi@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-bidi
