Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Thank you for taking care of this matter. But, I vaguely remember
>> that the reason I changed ChangeLog.unicode (I was using it when I was
>> working on it locally) to ChangeLog.22 was that if the extention of
>> ChangeLog file is not digits, something wrong happened. I'm not sure
>> now.
[...]
> I use such "non-numeric ChangeLog extensions" -- e.g., in my example
> code you quoted, "ChangeLog.tiling" -- regularly for my other branches
> with no obvious problems.
>
> If there is a subtle bug I haven't noticed with such ChangeLogs, we
> should fix that bug. The fact that you originally used the ".unicode"
> extension originally confirms that it's at least the "natural" name. :-)
[...]
ISTR that extensions with more than three letters are problematic on
MS DOS (and maybe MS Windows? no idea). How about "Changelog.ucs"?
Oliver
--
Oliver Scholz 26 PluviÃse an 213 de la RÃvolution
Ostendstr. 61 LibertÃ, EgalitÃ, FraternitÃ!
60314 Frankfurt a. M.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
