Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:14:59 -0800: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:19:03 -0800: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Tak Ota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Hi Kim, > >> > > >> > Sorry I neglected having my homework done before reporting the > >> > incident. Now I've narrowed it to a specific case. Here is the > >> > recipe. > > Hi Tak, > > I will take a look at the data later, but for the moment I have > disabled the xasserts, so can you test this again and see if there > are any _visible_ effects (such as truncated or mis-aligned glyphs) > caused by the problematic state detected by that assert.
Thanks Kim, I captured the info screen from the current CVS emacs and the old one (sometime last September) using the same BDF fonts and compared the two images pixel by pixel by blending the two images into one image. I don't find any difference between the two, except that the new menu items are underscored and there is a new Org Mode item. -Tak _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
