Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now that Richard has changed M-g to be a prefix key, can we > implement this plan? > > I would rather put this aside until after the release.
Discussing the full population of this binding, I might agree here. However, part of this proposal was due to C-x ` being very burdensome to type on many international keyboards. I don't think it makes sense to introduce M-g as a prefix without populating at least those slots which have made this proposal compelling. So I think that the next release should at the very least contain the (rather uncontentious) M-g M-p, M-g p, M-g M-n and M-g n bindings. All the rest is nice in various degrees, but those seem rather essential. > I would like a small group to organize to make a plan > for what to do with M-g, and discuss the question outside > of this list. Would those who want to do this please do so? I'd be willing to participate in such an off-list discussion if it proves necessary or beneficial. Let's raise the bar by demanding that anybody discussing it should also be willing to implement his proposals including documentation. Since we are talking about functionality that seems quite convenient to the average user, this includes the help sheets which probably should be checked for accuracy before release, anyhow, requiring speakers of different languages. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
