Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It would be very good to make this mode to work like edebug > > (automatically making the source code buffer read-only, etc.) > > and to have similar keybindings: > > > > " " - step > > "n" - next > > "c" - cont > > "g" - go > > ... > > Its seems more natural to use the existing abbreviations for GDB, as Dan > suggested: > > "s" - step > "n" - next > "c" - cont > "r" - run > "b" - break > ... > > although there is clearly a significant overlap, in any case.
I think we should strive to make all of this as similar as possible, so my take on it would be that we will, after the release of course, change Edebug's bindings to match the bindings of gdb more closely, as long as this works appropriately. Certainly the bindings of Edebug and Gud-mode should be identical (if the rest of the user interface is similar), and the bindings of Gud-mode and gdb itself as close as feasible. I think we will meet less total opposition if we change Edebug to match gdb more closely (where there are still discrepancies) rather than the other way round... -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
