>> It seems the problem is due to `back-to-indentation' which skips chars with
>> a "whitespace" syntax and NBSP does have whitespace syntax.
>> Maybe NBSP shouldn't have whitespace syntax.
> Whaaa? What syntax should it have instead?
I guess punctuation. An NBSP *looks like* whitespace but its intended
behavior is to not be treated like whitespace (at leasst according to this
bug-report).
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
