On Thu, Mar 31 2005, Lute Kamstra wrote: > Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Wed, Mar 30 2005, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote: >>> There's no ChangeLog for the recent changes of time-date.el and >>> I don't know who did it for what purpose, [...] >> ,----[ lisp/ChangeLog ] >> | 2005-03-23 Lute Kamstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> | [...] >> | * calendar/time-date.el: Add comment on time value formats. >> | Don't require parse-time. >> | (with-decoded-time-value): New macro. >> | (encode-time-value): New function. >> | (time-to-seconds, time-less-p, time-subtract, time-add): Use them. >> | (days-to-time): Return a valid time value when arg is huge. >> | (time-since): Use time-subtract. >> | (time-to-number-of-days): Use time-to-seconds. >> `----
I have added a ChangeLog in Gnus lisp/ChangeLog. >>> but at least the byte compiler complains to me about some missing >>> Lisp objects. What should we do for that? >> >> Probably we need to add (require 'parse-time) to nnimap.el, >> nnultimate.el and pop3.el. [...] > I removed (require 'parse-time) from time-date because it uses just > parse-time-string, which is autoloaded. Do I understand correctly my > change uncovered some bugs in nnimap.el, nnultimate.el and pop3.el? I > already noticed (and fixed) this for message.el. Wouldn't it be better to put (require 'parse-time) at the beginning of the file instead of inside `message-make-date'? > I don't use nnimap.el, nnultimate.el or pop3.el so I didn't catch > those. I'm sorry for that. I added (require 'parse-time) at the beginning of those files in Gnus stable branch. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel