Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes: > >> Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs. >>> After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal >>> is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you >>> would normally like to have for daily work. >> >> Yes, --bare-bones or --no-frills seem like good candidates, too. > > Since the option is primarily useful for debugging maybe its name > should contain the word debug.
-debug-setup This could also set debug-on-error. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
