"Eli Zaretskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Actually, it does not make sense to scale in that way. #3a7 really >> should be the same as #3333aaaa7777, so that #fff is the same as >> #ffffffffffff, pure white. > > That could be so, but: > > (1) The #RRGGBB syntax being a legacy thingy, I don't believe anyone > will want to change it; I'll grant that it is highly probably that this rather obvious amendment has been previously proposed. Maybe one would need an alternative syntax like %RRGGBB that would then be expanded in the more natural way of repetition instead of null-padding. Who would one have to approach for that, anyway? The Open Group? > and > > (2) As long as X does it this way, so must we, Surely. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
