Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Even if at one time before 1990 it might have been the case that >> the mode was not merely aliased, I doubt that pre-1990 >> compatibility is a major concern nowadays. > > But you can't claim that AUCTeX is "owning" the names either, since > they are clearly older.
I didn't claim any such thing. I just pointed out that the only conceivable effect of the aliases in our times is to cause trouble and confusion. If people need a historic excuse for blaming the bad effects of their current decisions on somebody else, this is fine with me. Have fun. Can we find something less ridiculous and irrelevant for the purpose of bashing our heads in? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
