Ken Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Apr 23, 2005, at 13:37, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> Hmm, one question though: why isn't it necessary to redefine constants >> like BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_EMACS_INT, EMACS_INT and so on, as done in >> the (for instance) AMD64 port file? > > I don't think it's actually needed in the AMD64 port either. The way > these get defined should work properly on any 64-bit system that > defines _LP64.
Ah, OK. > Somewhere I've got a source tree (from before I got hosed with work > and stopped being able to contribute) where one of my few pending > patches was the deletion of some of these symbols from the AMD > support, like I did for the Alpha in, oh, wow, was it back in 2002? > But I didn't get to test out or check in the AMD changes... Maybe > soon, now that I've got access to an AMD x86_64 system, and some > amount of spare time, I can fix that, and contribute a little more as > well. Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
