Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Similar defining macros use unquoted symbols too. To be backward > compatible, quoting the symbol is still allowed. > > Then the original text is OK. I just thought that it _had_ to be > [un]quoted, as in most macros. > > For simplicity and consistency, we should document it as using an > unquoted arg. There is no need to document the compatibility feature > of accepting the arg with a quote. > > (It seems to be documented this way already.)
Apparently, I read your mind. ;-) Lute. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
