> Indeed, but I think it's worth mentioning it in the docstring since I got
> caught by it: it's a sensible limitation, but it's not an obvious one.

Yes, you're right.

OTOH, to fix the function (other than modifying the docstring), I
think there's no need to make a new convert-standard-filename-element.
The interface of convert-standard-filename is not crowded, there's no
harm in adding a new argument.

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u


_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Reply via email to