Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this switch comes to pass, would the Emacs developers mind if I added
> the following line to CVSROOT/loginfo?
>
> lisp/mh-e $CVSROOT/CVSROOT/syncmail -u %{sVv} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Would you please explain what this would do? I don't understand,
> but I can't say yes until I understand.
This loginfo entry calls syncmail on each check-in for the lisp/mh-e
directory. The syncmail script, when run in the CVS loginfo context will
send a diff of each check-in to the given mailing list (mh-e-devel).
To see what this looks like please see:
https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7414775&forum_id=5136
The DEFAULT entry is used if no others match. For example, the Emacs
project could define:
DEFAULT $CVSROOT/CVSROOT/syncmail -u %{sVv} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If you have given someone write access to MH-E, we can give him
> write access to the Emacs repository.
Thank you. The list of developers that I've given write access to MH-E
can be found at:
https://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?group_id=13357
I've asked the MH-E developers to request Emacs write access on the
Savannah site. I would appreciate it if you gave it to them.
> However, these people should only make changes in MH-E, if they have
> only signed papers for MH-E.
I trust that won't be a problem.
> I think we should also ask these people
> to sign papers covering all of Emacs. But we don't have to wait for
> that.
Satyaki, Eric, and Peter: please find instructions to do this at
http://mh-e.sourceforge.net/doc/devguide.html#Prerequisites. Please
substitute Emacs for MH-E.
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
