On 6/9/05, Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something that would help a great deal is if one could create a buffer > that was hidden, ie: it did not ordinarily appear in the buffer list > and was not returned by a call to: > > (get-buffer buffername)
Why? The goal of not annoying users is served well enough by the leading-space convention, and there's ample support for creating unique buffers; why do you need a truly anonymous buffer? -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
