[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> I think the following patch is better -- can you pls. test it?

Okay, that works great too.

-- 
Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Reply via email to