> Apparently these timings are not very fixed. In a freshly started > Emacs, my proposed version took 12 seconds (instead of earlier 23) and > the abstract versions 40 seconds (instead of 51). This gives a > mysterious gain of 11 seconds for both. But now my proposed version > runs 3.33 times faster than the abstract ones, instead of earlier 2.2.
I noticed too that in sufficiently long Emacs sessions Lisp evaluation slows down. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
