[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gaëtan LEURENT) writes: > For UTF-16 with signature, I agree, but UTF-8 could sometimes match a > Latin-1 file. For instance, "4×½=2" encoded in Latin-1 is valid as a > UTF-8 string. A friend of mine suggested "Try our new exclusive WAZA® > for just $0.02!" which is even meaningful in both cases.
Coming up with isolated theoretical problem cases should not stop us from doing what is correct in the other 99% of cases. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
