Jason Rumney wrote: > "Drew Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > Windows, when you evaluate this Elisp code: >> > >> > (make-frame '((top . -1) (left . -1))) >> > >> > the new frame will not be positioned with its bottom-right >> corner in the >> > bottom-right of the display. > >> I don't understand your reply, sorry. Are you saying that Francis's bug fix >> will break "..." or that the reported bug (symptom quoted above) will break >> "..."? Are you saying we shouldn't try to fix this bug because that might >> break something else? > > I didn't understand the bug fix. I thought it was changing the way the > frame was positioned when negative arguments are given, however it > seems that misfeature already exists, and this fix was only a subtle > change to that misfeature. So this bug fix is not the problem, it is > the misfeature of treating negative coordinates specially.
Are you proposing that the meaning of a negative 'top or 'left frame parameter should be changed? If so, how? My patch merely attempts to make negative 'top and 'left frame parameters behave sanely in the case where a single monitor is used (which is the vast majority of the use cases). -- Francis Litterio franl <at> world . std . com _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
