On 8/7/05, Richard M. Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whether or not it convinces you (or any specific person) to change, it
> is very important that this list not drift into an ethical slumber
> where we treat the use of Windows as legitimate or normal.
I know, and I agree with you.
But, really, preaching to the choir does not serve any useful purpose.
That's what I'm saying. I usually comment or ask about Windows
questions. Do you really think that adding a paragraph like the one by
Robert at the start of every answer I receive is gonna produce any
result at all, other than increasing the levels of adrenaline in my
bloodstream and making me ignore that person's messages?
> We've
> decided to support Emacs on Windows, and that is probably a good thing
> to do, but that doesn't mean Windows is ethical.
No. But that does not make us, the people who use and work with
Windows, unethical. Our priorities are a bit different, that's all.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
