> is there a more elegant way of writing the following?
> (and word-at-point
> (test-completion word-at-point woman-topic-all-completions)
> word-at-point)
(when (and word-at-point
(test-completion word-at-point woman-topic-all-completions))
word-at-point)
It's more verbose, but brings across the purpose somewhat better.
Why don't we let `test-completion' return the completion (string) argument,
whenever the return value is non-nil?
This would then be simply:
(and word-at-point
(test-completion word-at-point woman-topic-all-completions))
This is a common use case - most uses of `test-completion' will want to use
the string, but only if it is a completion. And a return value of `t' is not
particularly useful.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
