> for `thing-at-point' i see: > > @result{} "Gentlemen may cry ``Peace! Peace!,''\n" > > which has the `\n' instead of a literal newline. i'd like to change the > former two to resemble the latter. any objections? any reason to go in > the opposite direction?
Neither of these functions returns `\n'. And `\n' is not an alternative for a literal newline. For differences, please see examples of newlines in the documentation of `print-escape-newlines' in (info "(elisp)Output Variables"). It demonstrates that the difference whether a function returns or prints a literal newline or `\n' is preserved in the Emacs Lisp Reference Manual. Since `thing-at-point' actually returns a literal newline instead of `\n', it would be more correct to replace `\n' with a literal newline in its example. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel