> Could none of those history-list bindings be sacrificed for accessing > "default" values (such as those Juri & Stefan have mentioned, and/or the > values in `minibuffer-completion-table')?
There are two different issues here: accessing the completion values, and accessing the default values supplied explicitly via the `default' argument of the minibuffer reading functions. So please make this distinction when discussing them. These are two different sets of values (though, one is a subset of another). 1. a list of all possible completions. There are many packages that provide key bindings for accessing next/previous completion items. AFAIK, most popular key pairs are [left]/[right], C-s/C-r, TAB/M-TAB. You seem to be advocating for unified key bindings for these packages. 2. a list of default values. The most natural key to access a list of default values is M-n. It could work like M-p for a list of history values, but in the opposite direction. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel