It is consistency between argument names in docstrings vs argument
names in the Emacs Lisp Reference a goal?
For example:
FUNCTION EMACS LISP REFERENCE DOCSTRING
----------------- ------------------------ -----------------------
setplist symbol plist symbol newplist
defcustom option default doc ... symbol value doc ...
defun name argument-list ... name arglist ...
gethash key table default key table dflt
indirect-function function object
eval-region start end stream ... start end printflag ...
kbd keyseq-text keys
make-frame alist parameters
split-window window size horizontal window size horflag
These were chosen almost at random, I didn't do a search looking for
differences.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
