> If someone would prefer some alternative (e.g., using 'arch' in some funky
> way), please let me know. I'm just assuming no one is going to want the
> Cocoa/GNUstep code anywhere near the main Emacs tree itself until it's
> quite stable.
As far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't mind seeing it added to the
emacs-unicode branch before it's "quite stable", as long as it doesn't
impact the rest of the code (i.e. those who use it, do it at their own risk,
while those who don't will not be affected).
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel