I was wondering why C-p and C-n are not binded like <up> and <down> in the minibuffer.
I agree. In fact, as I wrote on 9/01 (RE: make `occur' use word at point as default), I was thinking this was already the case (RMS corrected me). Although my main point was that we could redefine some of the redundant minibuffer bindings that are now equivalent to down/up, I assumed that C-n/C-p were among these, and I specifically did not suggest that we redefine those bindings. It's good to have down = C-n and up = C-p, IMO. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel