Then, why does sit-for return t if unread-command-events is not
nil?
That is a good question. Should it return nil immediately
without waiting when unread-command-events is nonempty?
That would be more coherent than the current behavior.
It would also be an incompatible change, and might break something.
There are about 550 calls to sit-for in the Emacs sources.
To check all of them would be a lot of work.
Perhaps we should make this change now, so that the pretesting
for the release will help us see if anything breaks.
What do people think?
Anyway, I installed your flyspell.el change as a work-around.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
